<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Risk Assessment |</title><link>https://cnardin.github.io/de/tags/risk-assessment/</link><atom:link href="https://cnardin.github.io/de/tags/risk-assessment/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Risk Assessment</description><generator>HugoBlox Kit (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>de-de</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Modelling of non-structural components of an industrial multi-storey frame for seismic risk assessment</title><link>https://cnardin.github.io/de/publication/articles/2023-beee-nsc/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cnardin.github.io/de/publication/articles/2023-beee-nsc/</guid><description>
&lt;div class="callout flex px-4 py-3 mb-6 rounded-md border-l-4 bg-cyan-100 dark:bg-cyan-900 border-cyan-500"
data-callout="abstract"
data-callout-metadata=""&gt;
&lt;span class="callout-icon pr-3 pt-1 text-cyan-600 dark:text-cyan-300"&gt;
&lt;svg height="24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24"&gt;&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="1.5" d="M9 12h3.75M9 15h3.75M9 18h3.75m3 .75H18a2.25 2.25 0 0 0 2.25-2.25V6.108c0-1.135-.845-2.098-1.976-2.192a48.424 48.424 0 0 0-1.123-.08m-5.801 0c-.065.21-.1.433-.1.664c0 .414.336.75.75.75h4.5a.75.75 0 0 0 .75-.75a2.25 2.25 0 0 0-.1-.664m-5.8 0A2.251 2.251 0 0 1 13.5 2.25H15a2.25 2.25 0 0 1 2.15 1.586m-5.8 0c-.376.023-.75.05-1.124.08C9.095 4.01 8.25 4.973 8.25 6.108V8.25m0 0H4.875c-.621 0-1.125.504-1.125 1.125v11.25c0 .621.504 1.125 1.125 1.125h9.75c.621 0 1.125-.504 1.125-1.125V9.375c0-.621-.504-1.125-1.125-1.125zM6.75 12h.008v.008H6.75zm0 3h.008v.008H6.75zm0 3h.008v.008H6.75z"/&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-content dark:text-neutral-300"&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-title font-semibold mb-1"&gt;Abstract&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-body"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seismic risk assessment of industrial facilities is complex due to the presence of different types of equipment. It represents a research issue that requires further investigation. To this end, some analytical approaches have been developed in the framework of performance-based earthquake engineering. Nonetheless, their accuracy in the case of complex critical facilities, such as nuclear and non-nuclear industrial plants, is still under investigation. Thus, the proposed study intends to research in depth, in a risk assessment framework, some critical aspects related to: (1) modelling of industrial facilities and their secondary equipment with different degrees of accuracy, also taking into account their dynamic interaction; (2) selection of seismic records for fragility analysis, due to the narrow distribution of frequency values for non-structural components; (3) effectiveness of performance-based earthquake engineering applied to this particular class of coupled structure-equipment for risk assessment. In this context, the proper selection of seismic records becomes relevant, and SCoRes, an innovative algorithm for accelerograms selection is worthy of investigation. On these premises, two different configurations of a primary industrial structure, i.e. a moment resisting frame and a braced frame, equipped with non-structural components and subjected to shake table test campaigns are selected as case studies. For the two configurations, a vulnerability assessment of two vertical tanks installed on the first floor was carried out. Along these lines, to establish the effectiveness of the proposed method for both the moment resisting frame and braced frame configurations, the mean annual frequency of exceedance of the bottom-wall strain of the above-mentioned tanks, both at the design basis and safe shutdown earthquake has been evaluated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout flex px-4 py-3 mb-6 rounded-md border-l-4 bg-emerald-100 dark:bg-emerald-900 border-emerald-500"
data-callout="tip"
data-callout-metadata=""&gt;
&lt;span class="callout-icon pr-3 pt-1 text-emerald-600 dark:text-emerald-300"&gt;
&lt;svg height="24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24"&gt;&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="1.5" d="M12 18v-5.25m0 0a6.01 6.01 0 0 0 1.5-.189m-1.5.189a6.01 6.01 0 0 1-1.5-.189m3.75 7.478a12.06 12.06 0 0 1-4.5 0m3.75 2.383a14.406 14.406 0 0 1-3 0M14.25 18v-.192c0-.983.658-1.823 1.508-2.316a7.5 7.5 0 1 0-7.517 0c.85.493 1.509 1.333 1.509 2.316V18"/&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-content dark:text-neutral-300"&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-title font-semibold mb-1"&gt;Tipp&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-body"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Click the &lt;em&gt;Cite&lt;/em&gt; button above to copy &lt;em&gt;.bib&lt;/em&gt; publication metadata into your notes.
or directly download here either the bibtex version:
&lt;a href="https://cnardin.github.io/papers/2023-BEEE-nsc.bib" target="_blank"&gt;Download BibTeX&lt;/a&gt;
or the plain text one:
&lt;a href="https://cnardin.github.io/papers/2023-BEEE-nsc.txt" target="_blank"&gt;Download Plain.txt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="scite-badge"
data-doi="doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01753-4"
data-layout="horizontal"
data-show-zero="false"
data-small="false"
data-show-labels="true"
data-tally-show="true"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;script async type="application/javascript" src="https://cdn.scite.ai/badge/scite-badge-latest.min.js"&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>