<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Surrogate Modelling |</title><link>https://cnardin.github.io/de/tags/surrogate-modelling/</link><atom:link href="https://cnardin.github.io/de/tags/surrogate-modelling/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Surrogate Modelling</description><generator>HugoBlox Kit (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>de-de</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>A generalized autoregressive model for time-variant dynamical systems</title><link>https://cnardin.github.io/de/publication/conferences/2026-rec-narx/</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cnardin.github.io/de/publication/conferences/2026-rec-narx/</guid><description>
&lt;div class="callout flex px-4 py-3 mb-6 rounded-md border-l-4 bg-cyan-100 dark:bg-cyan-900 border-cyan-500"
data-callout="abstract"
data-callout-metadata=""&gt;
&lt;span class="callout-icon pr-3 pt-1 text-cyan-600 dark:text-cyan-300"&gt;
&lt;svg height="24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24"&gt;&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="1.5" d="M9 12h3.75M9 15h3.75M9 18h3.75m3 .75H18a2.25 2.25 0 0 0 2.25-2.25V6.108c0-1.135-.845-2.098-1.976-2.192a48.424 48.424 0 0 0-1.123-.08m-5.801 0c-.065.21-.1.433-.1.664c0 .414.336.75.75.75h4.5a.75.75 0 0 0 .75-.75a2.25 2.25 0 0 0-.1-.664m-5.8 0A2.251 2.251 0 0 1 13.5 2.25H15a2.25 2.25 0 0 1 2.15 1.586m-5.8 0c-.376.023-.75.05-1.124.08C9.095 4.01 8.25 4.973 8.25 6.108V8.25m0 0H4.875c-.621 0-1.125.504-1.125 1.125v11.25c0 .621.504 1.125 1.125 1.125h9.75c.621 0 1.125-.504 1.125-1.125V9.375c0-.621-.504-1.125-1.125-1.125zM6.75 12h.008v.008H6.75zm0 3h.008v.008H6.75zm0 3h.008v.008H6.75z"/&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-content dark:text-neutral-300"&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-title font-semibold mb-1"&gt;Abstract&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-body"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Surrogate models are a staple tool for the reliability analysis of complex engineering systems, because they enable the use of otherwise computationally prohibitive algorithms, such as Monte-Carlo simulation. Their prevalence in the context of nonlinear dynamic engineering systems, however, is significantly lower, because approximating their time-dependent response is generally considered more challenging than for their static counterparts. A powerful class of surrogate models is provided by autoregressive with exogenous input models, but their use is mostly limited to system identification tasks, as they tend to underperform in pure prediction tasks. Recent advances in data-driven autoregressive modeling, have vastly improved their prediction capabilities for engineering applications, but they still rely on the assumption of time-invariant dynamics at the core of NARX. In this contribution we demonstrate how the mNARX+ framework can efficiently handle time-variant dynamical systems, such as, e.g., civil or mechanical structures subject to plastic damage or fatigue accumulation, making it an ideal tool for their reliability assessment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout flex px-4 py-3 mb-6 rounded-md border-l-4 bg-emerald-100 dark:bg-emerald-900 border-emerald-500"
data-callout="tip"
data-callout-metadata=""&gt;
&lt;span class="callout-icon pr-3 pt-1 text-emerald-600 dark:text-emerald-300"&gt;
&lt;svg height="24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24"&gt;&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="1.5" d="M12 18v-5.25m0 0a6.01 6.01 0 0 0 1.5-.189m-1.5.189a6.01 6.01 0 0 1-1.5-.189m3.75 7.478a12.06 12.06 0 0 1-4.5 0m3.75 2.383a14.406 14.406 0 0 1-3 0M14.25 18v-.192c0-.983.658-1.823 1.508-2.316a7.5 7.5 0 1 0-7.517 0c.85.493 1.509 1.333 1.509 2.316V18"/&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-content dark:text-neutral-300"&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-title font-semibold mb-1"&gt;Tipp&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-body"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Click the &lt;em&gt;Cite&lt;/em&gt; button above to copy &lt;em&gt;.bib&lt;/em&gt; publication metadata into your notes.
or directly download here either the bibtex version:
&lt;a href="https://cnardin.github.io/papers/2026-REC-narx.bib" target="_blank"&gt;Download BibTeX&lt;/a&gt;
or the plain text one:
&lt;a href="https://cnardin.github.io/papers/2026-REC-narx.txt" target="_blank"&gt;Download Plain.txt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="scite-badge"
data-doi="doi.org/10.17877/tudobooks-11.153"
data-layout="horizontal"
data-show-zero="false"
data-small="false"
data-show-labels="true"
data-tally-show="true"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;script async type="application/javascript" src="https://cdn.scite.ai/badge/scite-badge-latest.min.js"&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;</description></item><item><title>UQ state-dependent framework for seismic fragility assessment of industrial components</title><link>https://cnardin.github.io/de/publication/articles/2025-ress-state-dependent/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cnardin.github.io/de/publication/articles/2025-ress-state-dependent/</guid><description>
&lt;div class="callout flex px-4 py-3 mb-6 rounded-md border-l-4 bg-cyan-100 dark:bg-cyan-900 border-cyan-500"
data-callout="abstract"
data-callout-metadata=""&gt;
&lt;span class="callout-icon pr-3 pt-1 text-cyan-600 dark:text-cyan-300"&gt;
&lt;svg height="24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24"&gt;&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="1.5" d="M9 12h3.75M9 15h3.75M9 18h3.75m3 .75H18a2.25 2.25 0 0 0 2.25-2.25V6.108c0-1.135-.845-2.098-1.976-2.192a48.424 48.424 0 0 0-1.123-.08m-5.801 0c-.065.21-.1.433-.1.664c0 .414.336.75.75.75h4.5a.75.75 0 0 0 .75-.75a2.25 2.25 0 0 0-.1-.664m-5.8 0A2.251 2.251 0 0 1 13.5 2.25H15a2.25 2.25 0 0 1 2.15 1.586m-5.8 0c-.376.023-.75.05-1.124.08C9.095 4.01 8.25 4.973 8.25 6.108V8.25m0 0H4.875c-.621 0-1.125.504-1.125 1.125v11.25c0 .621.504 1.125 1.125 1.125h9.75c.621 0 1.125-.504 1.125-1.125V9.375c0-.621-.504-1.125-1.125-1.125zM6.75 12h.008v.008H6.75zm0 3h.008v.008H6.75zm0 3h.008v.008H6.75z"/&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-content dark:text-neutral-300"&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-title font-semibold mb-1"&gt;Abstract&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-body"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recently, there has been increased interest in assessing the seismic fragility of industrial plants and process equipment. This is reflected in the growing number of studies, community-funded research projects and experimental campaigns on the matter. Nonetheless, the complexity of the problem and its inherent modelling, coupled with a general scarcity of available data on process equipment, has limited the development of risk assessment methods. In fact, these limitations have led to the creation of simplified and quick-to-run models. In this context, we propose an innovative framework for developing state-dependent fragility functions. This new methodology combines limited data with the power of metamodelling and statistical techniques, namely polynomial chaos expansions (PCE) and bootstrapping. Therefore, we validated the framework on a simplified and computationally efficient MDoF system endowed with Bouc–Wen hysteresis. Then, we tested it on a real nonstructural industrial process component. Specifically, we applied the state-dependent fragility framework to a critical vertical tank of a multicomponent full-scale 3D steel braced frame (BF). The seismic performance of the BF endowed with process components was captured by means of shake table campaign within the European SPIF project. Finally, we derived state-dependent fragility functions based on the combination of PCE and bootstrap at a greatly reduced computational cost.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout flex px-4 py-3 mb-6 rounded-md border-l-4 bg-emerald-100 dark:bg-emerald-900 border-emerald-500"
data-callout="tip"
data-callout-metadata=""&gt;
&lt;span class="callout-icon pr-3 pt-1 text-emerald-600 dark:text-emerald-300"&gt;
&lt;svg height="24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24"&gt;&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="1.5" d="M12 18v-5.25m0 0a6.01 6.01 0 0 0 1.5-.189m-1.5.189a6.01 6.01 0 0 1-1.5-.189m3.75 7.478a12.06 12.06 0 0 1-4.5 0m3.75 2.383a14.406 14.406 0 0 1-3 0M14.25 18v-.192c0-.983.658-1.823 1.508-2.316a7.5 7.5 0 1 0-7.517 0c.85.493 1.509 1.333 1.509 2.316V18"/&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-content dark:text-neutral-300"&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-title font-semibold mb-1"&gt;Tipp&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-body"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Click the &lt;em&gt;Cite&lt;/em&gt; button above to copy &lt;em&gt;.bib&lt;/em&gt; publication metadata into your notes.&lt;br&gt;
or directly download here either the bibtex version:
&lt;a href="https://cnardin.github.io/papers/RESS_2025_Nardin.bib" target="_blank"&gt;Download BibTeX&lt;/a&gt;
or the plain text one:
&lt;a href="https://cnardin.github.io/papers/RESS_2025_Nardin.txt" target="_blank"&gt;Download Plain.txt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="scite-badge" data-doi="10.1016/j.ress.2025.111067" data-layout="horizontal" data-show-zero="false" data-small="false" data-show-labels="true" data-tally-show="true"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;script async type="application/javascript" src="https://cdn.scite.ai/badge/scite-badge-latest.min.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;</description></item><item><title>Seismic experimental analyses and surrogate models of multi-component systems in special-risk industrial facilities</title><link>https://cnardin.github.io/de/publication/articles/2022-phd-thesis/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cnardin.github.io/de/publication/articles/2022-phd-thesis/</guid><description>
&lt;div class="callout flex px-4 py-3 mb-6 rounded-md border-l-4 bg-cyan-100 dark:bg-cyan-900 border-cyan-500"
data-callout="abstract"
data-callout-metadata=""&gt;
&lt;span class="callout-icon pr-3 pt-1 text-cyan-600 dark:text-cyan-300"&gt;
&lt;svg height="24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24"&gt;&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="1.5" d="M9 12h3.75M9 15h3.75M9 18h3.75m3 .75H18a2.25 2.25 0 0 0 2.25-2.25V6.108c0-1.135-.845-2.098-1.976-2.192a48.424 48.424 0 0 0-1.123-.08m-5.801 0c-.065.21-.1.433-.1.664c0 .414.336.75.75.75h4.5a.75.75 0 0 0 .75-.75a2.25 2.25 0 0 0-.1-.664m-5.8 0A2.251 2.251 0 0 1 13.5 2.25H15a2.25 2.25 0 0 1 2.15 1.586m-5.8 0c-.376.023-.75.05-1.124.08C9.095 4.01 8.25 4.973 8.25 6.108V8.25m0 0H4.875c-.621 0-1.125.504-1.125 1.125v11.25c0 .621.504 1.125 1.125 1.125h9.75c.621 0 1.125-.504 1.125-1.125V9.375c0-.621-.504-1.125-1.125-1.125zM6.75 12h.008v.008H6.75zm0 3h.008v.008H6.75zm0 3h.008v.008H6.75z"/&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-content dark:text-neutral-300"&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-title font-semibold mb-1"&gt;Abstract&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-body"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nowadays, earthquakes are one of the most catastrophic natural events that have a significant human, socio-economic and environmental impact. Besides, based on both observations of damage following recent major/moderate seismic events and numerical/experimental studies, it clearly emerges that critical non-structural components (NSCs) that are ubiquitous to most industrial facilities are particularly and even disproportionately vulnerable to those events. Nonetheless and despite their great importance, seismic provisions for industrial facilities and their process equipment are still based on the classical load-and-resistance factor design (LRFD) approach; a performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) approach should, instead, be preferred. Along this vein, in recent years, much research has been devoted to setting computational fragility frameworks for special-risk industrial components and structures. However, within a PBEE perspective, studies have clearly remarked: i) a lack of definition of performance objectives for NSCs; ii) the need for fully comprehensive testing campaigns data on coupling effects between main structures and NSCs. In this respect, this doctorate thesis introduces a computational framework for an efficient and accurate seismic state-dependent fragility analysis; it is based on a combination of data acquired from an extensive experimental shake table test campaign on a full-scale prototype industrial steel frame structure and the most recent surrogate-based UQ forward analysis advancements. Specifically, the framework is applied to a real-world application consisting of seismic shake table tests of a representative industrial multistorey frame structure equipped with complex process components, carried out at the EUCENTRE facility in Italy, within the European SPIF project: Seismic Performance of Multi-Component Systems in Special Risk Industrial Facilities. The results of this experimental research campaign also aspire to improve the understanding of these complex systems and improve the knowledge of FE modelling techniques. The main goals aim to reduce the huge computational burden and to assess, as well, when the importance of coupling effects between NSCs and the main structure comes into play. Insights provided by innovative monitoring systems were then deployed to develop and validate numerical and analytical models. At the same time, the adoption of Der Kiureghian&amp;rsquo;s stochastic site-based ground motion model (GMM) was deemed necessary to severely excite the process equipment and supplement the scarcity of real records with a specific frequency content capable of enhancing coupling effects. Finally, to assess the seismic risk of NSCs of those special facilities, this thesis introduces state-dependent fragility curves that consider the accumulation of damage effects due to sequential seismic events. To this end, the computational burden was alleviated by adopting polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) surrogate models. More precisely, the dimensionality of a seismic input random vector has been reduced by performing the principal component analysis (PCA) on the experimental realizations. Successively, by bootstrapping on the experimental design, separate PCE coefficients have been determined, yielding a full response sample at each point. Eventually, empirical state-dependent fragility curves were derived.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout flex px-4 py-3 mb-6 rounded-md border-l-4 bg-emerald-100 dark:bg-emerald-900 border-emerald-500"
data-callout="tip"
data-callout-metadata=""&gt;
&lt;span class="callout-icon pr-3 pt-1 text-emerald-600 dark:text-emerald-300"&gt;
&lt;svg height="24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24"&gt;&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="1.5" d="M12 18v-5.25m0 0a6.01 6.01 0 0 0 1.5-.189m-1.5.189a6.01 6.01 0 0 1-1.5-.189m3.75 7.478a12.06 12.06 0 0 1-4.5 0m3.75 2.383a14.406 14.406 0 0 1-3 0M14.25 18v-.192c0-.983.658-1.823 1.508-2.316a7.5 7.5 0 1 0-7.517 0c.85.493 1.509 1.333 1.509 2.316V18"/&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-content dark:text-neutral-300"&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-title font-semibold mb-1"&gt;Tipp&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-body"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Click the &lt;em&gt;Cite&lt;/em&gt; button above to copy &lt;em&gt;.bib&lt;/em&gt; publication metadata into your notes.
or directly download here either the bibtex version:
&lt;a href="https://cnardin.github.io/papers/2022-PhD-thesis.bib" target="_blank"&gt;Download BibTeX&lt;/a&gt;
or the plain text one:
&lt;a href="https://cnardin.github.io/papers/2022-PhD-thesis.txt" target="_blank"&gt;Download Plain.txt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>